Cross-Border Payments2025

Stablecoin Payments for Real Corridors

Hero image for Stablecoin Payments for Real Corridors

Role

Founding Designer

Team

Smart Contract Engineer

Mobile Engineer

Backend Engineer

Skills

Consumer Crypto

Cross-Border Payments

Emerging Markets

Figma

$2.4M
sent through corridors
8,200
active senders
8 sec
median Lagos → London
2.4%
effective rate vs 5–8%

Kano

A stablecoin payments product for the corridors people actually send money across. **Lagos to London. Accra to Paris. Nairobi to Dubai.** Warm and human, closer to a consumer fintech app. The geography is the product.

Kano Send on a phone frame. “Send $1,200 to Lagos.” No chain, no gas, no address.
Kano Send on a phone frame. “Send $1,200 to Lagos.” No chain, no gas, no address.
The receipt screen, the trust moment. Formatted like a bank transfer, not an explorer.
The receipt screen, the trust moment. Formatted like a bank transfer, not an explorer.

The Problem

Sending money from Lagos to London costs 5 to 8 percent and takes up to three days. The infrastructure to do it in seconds for near-zero fees has existed for years. The product that makes it accessible to the sender has not.

Crypto fixed the rails. Nobody fixed the experience.

This is a translation problem, not a technology one. The complexity is the product’s to absorb.

Every major wallet exposes chain, address, gas. Built for crypto natives, not the remittance sender.
Every major wallet exposes chain, address, gas. Built for crypto natives, not the remittance sender.

What I Saw

Remittance to Africa is a $54 billion annual market. The incumbents capture an estimated **$3.8 billion in fees** every year. The technology to undercut them closed the gap years ago. The product gap did not.

Every existing crypto product asked the sender to learn a new mental model: pick a chain, hold a wallet, manage gas. The remittance sender is *exactly* the wrong persona for that.

$54B sent. $3.8B in fees. Zero crypto products built for the sender.
The on-ramp problem. MoonPay, Onramper, Mercuryo all optimize for crypto purchase, not cross-border send.
The on-ramp problem. MoonPay, Onramper, Mercuryo all optimize for crypto purchase, not cross-border send.

What I Built

Three layers.

**Kano Send** is the consumer surface: enter an amount, pick a destination, send. No chain, no gas, no wallet address.

**Kano Corridors** are pre-mapped routes with optimized liquidity paths. Each corridor is a product decision, not a parameter. Choosing to ship Lagos to London first, instead of a generic any-to-any rail, was the call that made the rest tractable. A named corridor lets us pre-position liquidity, vet the on and off ramps, and tune the FX spread for that one route, so the sender gets a clean rate instead of whatever the open market happens to offer that second.

**Kano AI Routing** picks the route in real time on fees, liquidity, and speed. It weighs depth on each path so a large send does not slip, and falls back to a second route when the first thins out. The user never sees any of it. They just see “arrives in 8 seconds.”

01
Amount
Enter what you want to send
02
Destination
Pick a corridor
03
Route
AI picks fastest, cheapest path
04
Receipt
Bank-style confirmation
Four screens. No chain, no gas, no wallet address. Complexity lives underneath.
Kano Send: Amount → Destination → Routing → Receipt. No crypto jargon in the default flow.
Kano Send: Amount → Destination → Routing → Receipt. No crypto jargon in the default flow.
AI Routing in flight. “Finding best route” resolves to “Arrives in 8 seconds.”
AI Routing in flight. “Finding best route” resolves to “Arrives in 8 seconds.”

The Design Challenge

The hardest constraint was earned trust. These users are sending rent, school fees, family support, where failure is not a learning experience. Every decision had to answer: *would someone who has never touched crypto trust this with ₦200,000?*

**Hide the infrastructure.** Routing, chains, stablecoin mechanics: none of it shows by default. It lives one tap deeper for anyone who wants to verify it, because hiding complexity is not the same as hiding the truth.

**The receipt is the trust moment.** A receipt, not a hash. Sender name, recipient name, amount sent, amount received, the rate, the time, formatted like a bank transfer. It shows both amounts and the exact rate on purpose, so the sender can hand it to the person on the other end and nobody has to take it on faith. That is where the user decides whether to come back.

**The AI does not explain itself.** “Finding best route” resolves to a clear result. No progress bars, no reasoning trace. The user sees the outcome, not the work.

Design decision
Expose the routing or hide it?
Expose the AI (industry default)Show reasoning, build trust through transparency.
Hide and deliverOne animated line resolves to a clear result.
Picked
Why

Senders are not modelling how the AI works. They are deciding whether the money arrived. Reasoning UI is noise where success is the only signal.

Color
Warm creamCanvas
#FAF7F0
Lagos amberSignal
#E8A555
Deep inkType
#1A1A1A
Settled greenReceipt confirmation
#0E7C5C
Type
Geist SansUI
$1,200 to Lagos
PP EditorialDisplay
Arrives in 8 seconds
Geist MonoNumerics
₦1,872,400.00
Consumer fintech, not crypto. The receipt looks like a bank transfer.
BeforeAdjacent crypto payment apps
  • Pick a chain
  • Select stablecoin
  • Manage gas
  • Approve token
  • Sign transaction
  • Wait for confirmation

Six steps. Every word leaks mechanism into the surface.

AfterKano Send
  • Amount
  • Destination
  • Send

Three steps. Zero crypto vocabulary on the default flow.

The same money movement, two registers. The infrastructure is not the product. The receipt is.
Receipt at full zoom. “John sent $1,200 to Mary. Mary received ₦1,872,400.00.”
Receipt at full zoom. “John sent $1,200 to Mary. Mary received ₦1,872,400.00.”
Corridor map. Six live, three more mapped. Curated per corridor.
Corridor map. Six live, three more mapped. Curated per corridor.

Outcomes

Six months from soft launch, Kano has sent **$2.4M across six live corridors** with **8,200 active senders**. Median Lagos → London settlement is **8.2 seconds**, and the effective rate including FX spread is **2.4% vs the 5–8% incumbents charge.** First-time users complete the send flow **67% of the time**, triple the typical crypto-payment funnel.

The receipt is the entire product. I do not care what chain it is on. I care that my mother saw the money before she finished reading my message.

*Designer in Paris, sends to Accra weekly.*

Live at kano-ten.vercel.app.

$2.4M
sent through 6 corridors
8,200
active senders · 4 countries
67%
first-time completion · 3× crypto-payment avg
2.4%
effective rate vs 5–8% incumbents